FAQs
Frequently Asked Questions
Remember that your Human Resources or Equal Employment Opportunities representatives can help answer questions you might have.
Knowing your rights, protections, and benefits can be challenging, particularly with the administrative changes that have recently occurred. This series of questions can help to provide insight into these questions.
PrideVA Information
LGBTQ+ Employee Rights and Protections
LGBTQ+ FEDERAL EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
CITATIONS
[1] 590 U.S. ___, 140 S. Ct. 1731 (2020).
[2] In Macy v. Dep’t of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. 0120120821 (Apr. 20, 2012), a Commission-voted decision involving an applicant for federal employment, the EEOC determined that transgender discrimination, including discrimination because an employee does not conform to gender norms or stereotypes, is sex discrimination in violation of Title VII based on a plain interpretation of the statutory language prohibiting discrimination because of sex. Specifically, the Commission explained that discrimination based on an employee’s gender identity is sex discrimination “regardless of whether an employer discriminates against an employee [for expressing the employee’s] gender in a non-stereotypical fashion, because the employer is uncomfortable with the fact that the person has transitioned or is in the process of transitioning from one gender to another, or because the employer simply does not like that the person is identifying as a transgender person.”
[3] In Baldwin v. Dep’t of Transp., EEOC Appeal No. 0120133080 (July 15, 2015), a Commission-voted decision involving a failure to permanently hire an individual as an air traffic controller, the Commission concluded that a claim alleging discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation necessarily states a claim of discrimination on the basis of sex under Title VII.
[4] See Bart M. v. Dep’t of the Interior, EEOC Appeal No. 0120160543 (Jan. 14, 2021).
[5] See Macy v. Dep’t of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. 0120120821 (Apr. 20, 2012).
[6] See Lusardi v. Dep’t of the Army, EEOC Appeal No. 0120133395 (Apr. 1, 2015) (concluding in an EEOC decision involving a federal employee that Title VII is violated where an employer denies an employee equal access to a common restroom corresponding to the employee’s gender identity).